In Hillside Park Ltd v. Snowdonia National Park Authority (‘Hillside’), the Supreme Court has revisited the principles for determining the validity of multiple planning permissions.
This important case considers the lawfulness of development pursuant to overlapping planning permissions and has potential wider implications for the planning strategy for development sites subject to multiple planning permissions and, in particular, the common practice of using ”drop-in” permissions.
This Note sets out some of the key principles of the Hillside judgment before considering the different routes available for amending planning applications and wider implications.
For more information on any of these topics, our expertise and knowledge in the sector, or to discuss a particular project, please do contact one of our team.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |